Go to:
Foundation Program Sites
FHCQ
Foundation for Health Care Quality
COAP
Care Outcomes Assessment Program
Spine COAP
Care Outcomes Assessment Program
SCOAP
Care Outcomes Assessment Program
OBCOAP
Care Outcomes Assessment Program
CBDR
Smooth Transitions
WPSC
Patient Safety Coalition
Bree Collaborative
Bree Collaborative
Health Equity
Health Equity
Contact Us
Washington
Patient Safety Coalition
LOG IN
JOIN US
ABOUT WPSC
Who We Are
Our Members
INITIATIVES
Current Initiatives
Speak-Up! Award
ART SPEAKS
Communication and Resolution
TOOLS & RESOURCES
Public Resources
Patient Resources
MEDIA LIBRARY
Friday 5 Newsletters
The Safety Blog
Podcast
Webinars
2024 CONFERENCE
PREVIOUS CONFERENCES
EVENTS
2024 Nursing Contact Hour
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
21st Annual Northwest Patient Safety Conference - October 15-16, 2024
Organization: Davis Continuing Education
Location: Patient Safety Conference Zoom Webinar/Meeting
Please complete this conference evaluation for the presentations you attended live or watched recorded. Upon receipt we will send you the certificate with your contact hours. We will base your contact hours on the sessions you respond to on the evaluation.
''Provider approved by the California Board of Registered Nursing, Provider Number CEP 16359 for 16.8 contact hours.''
Name
*
First
Last
Email
*
Provider number:
*
_____________________________________________________________
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 15, 2024
_____________________________________________________________
KEYNOTE 1: 8:00 - 9:00 am
1. When We Do Harm: Medical Error and the Human Condition - Danielle Ofri, MD, Ph.D., D.Litt (Hon), FACP
1. Learning Objectives: A) Describe how the culture of medicine can endanger the health and safety of patients. B) Explain the role of emotions, cognition, and communication regarding medical error. C) Identify opportunities to improve the delivery of care while navigating an imperfect health care environment.
1. Did you Attend/View this Presentation?
Yes
No
1. The Presentation Objectives were Met:
Completely
Somewhat
Not at All
1. Quality of the Presentation Material:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
1. Expertise of Presenter:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
1. Appropriateness of Teaching Strategies:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
1. Presentation Rating and Relevance
1. Applicable to My Profession:
Completely
Somewhat
Not at All
1. The Information will Change Practice:
A Great Deal
Moderate Amount
Not at All
1. Gained Knowledge from Presentation:
A Great Deal
Moderate Amount
Not at All
1. State one change in your practice:
*
1. Overall Rating of this Activity:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
_____________________________________________________________
BREAKOUT SESSION A: 9:15 - 10:15 am
2. Foundation for Health Care Quality, Award Winners Round Table – Kelli Houston, Leo Sergio Morales, MD, Natalia Usoltseva MD, FACP, MHA, Nicole Jones, Zandrea Harlin
2. Learning Objectives: A) Describe how collaborative care contributes to patient safety and outcomes. B) Describe how organizations embed equity principles into best practices. C) Explain specifics around quality improvement activities that are focused on equity.
2. Did you Attend/View this Presentation?
Yes
No
2. The Presentation Objectives were Met:
Completely
Somewhat
Not at All
2. Quality of the Presentation Material:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
2a. Kelli Houston
2a. Expertise of Presenter:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
2a. Appropriateness of Teaching Strategies:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
2b. Nicole Jones
2b. Expertise of Presenter:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
2b. Expertise of Presenter:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
2c. Leo Sergio Morales, MD
2c. Expertise of Presenter:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
2c. Appropriateness of Teaching Strategies:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
2d. Natalia Usoltseva MD, FACP, MHA
2d. Expertise of Presenter:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
2d. Appropriateness of Teaching Strategies:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
2e. Zandrea Harlin
2e. Expertise of Presenter:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
2e. Appropriateness of Teaching Strategies:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
2. Presentation Rating and Relevance
2. Applicable to My Profession:
Completely
Somewhat
Not at All
2. The Information will Change Practice:
A Great Deal
Moderate Amount
Not at All
2. Gained Knowledge from Presentation:
A Great Deal
Moderate Amount
Not at All
2. State one change in your practice:
*
2. Overall Rating of this Activity:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
_____________________________________________________________
BREAKOUT SESSION A: 9:15 - 10:15 am
3. Using Physical, Testimonial and Documentary Evidence to Investigate Patient Harm Events - Jonathan D. Stewart, JD, MSc, MS, RN, CPPS, CPHRM
3. Learning Objectives: A) Describe the elements of thorough and credible investigations into patient harm events. B) Explain the Cognitive Interviewing protocol. C) Discuss the use of testimonial, documentary, and physical evidence to inform the analysis of patient harm events.
3. Did you Attend/View this Presentation?
Yes
No
3. The Presentation Objectives were Met:
Completely
Somewhat
Not at All
3. Quality of the Presentation Material:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
3. Expertise of Presenter:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
3. Appropriateness of Teaching Strategies:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
3. Presentation Rating and Relevance
3. Applicable to My Profession:
Completely
Somewhat
Not at All
3. The Information will Change Practice:
A Great Deal
Moderate Amount
Not at All
3. Gained Knowledge from Presentation:
A Great Deal
Moderate Amount
Not at All
3. State one change in your practice:
*
3. Overall Rating of this Activity:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
_____________________________________________________________
BREAKOUT SESSION A: 9:15 - 10:15 am
4. Hard Truths about the Long-Term Care Sector: Where do we go from here? - Barbara Kohnen Adriance, MPP
4. Learning Objectives: A) Explain why long-term care facilities are not safe for residents or staff. B) Describe how some communities have made change. C) Describe the urgent need for change.
4. Did you Attend/View this Presentation?
Yes
No
4. Expertise of Presenter:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
4. Appropriateness of Teaching Strategies:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
4. The Presentation Objectives were Met:
Completely
Somewhat
Not at All
4. Quality of the Presentation Material:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
4. Presentation Rating and Relevance
4. Applicable to My Profession:
Completely
Somewhat
Not at All
4. The Information will Change Practice:
A Great Deal
Moderate Amount
Not at All
4. Gained Knowledge from Presentation:
A Great Deal
Moderate Amount
Not at All
4. State one change in your practice:
*
4. Overall Rating of this Activity:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
_____________________________________________________________
KEYNOTE 2: 10:30 -11:30 am
5. Civility Rising! Best Practices to Inspire Healthy Work Environments - Cynthia Clark, Ph.D., RN, ANEF, FAAN
5. Learning Objectives: A) Explain the State of the Science related to civility, incivility, and other forms of workplace aggression. B) Describe the impact of incivility on individuals, teams, organizations, and patient care. C) Identify individual & organizational competencies to foster healthy, productive work environments.
5. Did you Attend/View this Presentation?
Yes
No
5. The Presentation Objectives were Met:
Completely
Somewhat
Not at All
5. Quality of the Presentation Material:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
5. Expertise of Presenter:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
5. Appropriateness of Teaching Strategies:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
5. Presentation Rating and Relevance
5. Applicable to My Profession:
Completely
Somewhat
Not at All
5. The Information will Change Practice:
A Great Deal
Moderate Amount
Not at All
5. Gained Knowledge from Presentation:
A Great Deal
Moderate Amount
Not at All
5. State one change in your practice:
*
5. Overall Rating of this Activity:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
_____________________________________________________________
KEYNOTE 3: 11:45 am -12:45 pm
6. AI for Clinical Diagnosis at the Crossroads A Tale of Two Possible Futures - David Newman-Toker, MD, Ph.D.
6. Learning Objectives: A) Identify the public health burden & financial impact of diagnostic errors and misdiagnosis-related harms. B) Discuss potential pitfalls of applying artificial intelligence (AI) for clinical diagnosis without adequate guardrails. C) Describe prerequisites and systems of care essential to deploying AI to achieve diagnostic excellence.
6. Did you Attend/View this Presentation?
Yes
No
6. The Presentation Objectives were Met:
Completely
Somewhat
Not at All
6. Quality of the Presentation Material:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
6. Expertise of Presenter:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
6. Appropriateness of Teaching Strategies:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
6. Presentation Rating and Relevance
6. Applicable to My Profession:
Completely
Somewhat
Not at All
6. The Information will Change Practice:
A Great Deal
Moderate Amount
Not at All
6. Gained Knowledge from Presentation:
A Great Deal
Moderate Amount
Not at All
6. State one change in your practice:
*
6. Overall Rating of this Activity:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
_______________________________________________________________
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2024
_______________________________________________________________
KEYNOTE 4: 8:00 - 9:00 am
7. Safety, Risk, and Intersex Management - Elizabeth Reis, Ph.D.
7. Learning Objectives: A) Describe the historical motivations of intersex management. B) Discuss the meaning of medical harm in the context of pediatric genital surgeries. C) Explain how patient safety impacts decisions involving children’s rights.
7. Did you Attend/View this Presentation?
Yes
No
7. The Presentation Objectives were Met:
Completely
Somewhat
Not at All
7. Quality of the Presentation Material:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
7. Expertise of Presenter:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
7. Appropriateness of Teaching Strategies:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
7. Presentation Rating and Relevance
7. Applicable to My Profession:
Completely
Somewhat
Not at All
7. The Information will Change Practice:
A Great Deal
Moderate Amount
Not at All
7. Gained Knowledge from Presentation:
A Great Deal
Moderate Amount
Not at All
7. State one change in your practice:
*
7. Overall Rating of this Activity:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
_____________________________________________________________
BREAKOUT SESSION B: 9:15 - 10:15 am
8. Artificial Intelligence and health care: Its applications and hidden dangers - Sian Hsiang-Te Tsuei, MD, Ph.D.
8. Learning Objectives: A) Describe artificial intelligence. B) Identify opportunities around how AI can improve health care service delivery. C) Identify potential ethical and legal threats around AI implementation.
8. Did you Attend/View this Presentation?
Yes
No
8. Expertise of Presenter:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
8. Appropriateness of Teaching Strategies:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
8. The Presentation Objectives were Met:
Completely
Somewhat
Not at All
8. Quality of the Presentation Material:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
8. Presentation Rating and Relevance
8. Applicable to My Profession:
Completely
Somewhat
Not at All
8. The Information will Change Practice:
A Great Deal
Moderate Amount
Not at All
8. Gained Knowledge from Presentation:
A Great Deal
Moderate Amount
Not at All
8. State one change in your practice:
*
8. Overall Rating of this Activity:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
_____________________________________________________________
BREAKOUT SESSION B: 9:15 - 10:15 am
9. A restorative approach to harm and preparing for uncertainty - Carolyn Canfield
9. Learning Objectives: A. Explain how relationship-building with patients can affect the safety of care and management of risk. B. Describe “What’s One Thing…?” questions to open trust-building conversations and learn patient priorities. C. Describe how to apply a “Social Determinants of Trust” lens on building foundations for trust with patients, right from the start.
9. Did you Attend/View this Presentation?
Yes
No
9. Expertise of Presenter:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
9. Appropriateness of Teaching Strategies:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
9. The Presentation Objectives were Met:
Completely
Somewhat
Not at All
9. Quality of the Presentation Material:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
9. Presentation Rating and Relevance
9. Applicable to My Profession:
Completely
Somewhat
Not at All
9. The Information will Change Practice:
A Great Deal
Moderate Amount
Not at All
9. Gained Knowledge from Presentation:
A Great Deal
Moderate Amount
Not at All
9. State one change in your practice:
*
9. Overall Rating of this Activity:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
_____________________________________________________________
BREAKOUT SESSION B: 9:15 - 10:15 am
10. Systemic Racism in Health Professions Education and Possible Solutions: Enhancing Patient Quality and Safety - Daryl Traylor, M.S., MPH, Ph.D.
10. Learning Objectives: A) Identify Systemic Racism in Health Professions Education. B) Explain the Impact of Systemic Racism on Patient Quality and Safety. C) Describe Implementation Strategies to Mitigate Systemic Racism and Improve Patient Outcomes.
10. Did you Attend/View this Presentation?
Yes
No
10. The Presentation Objectives were Met:
Completely
Somewhat
Not at All
10. Quality of the Presentation Material:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
10. Expertise of Presenter:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
10. Appropriateness of Teaching Strategies:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
10. Presentation Rating and Relevance
10. Applicable to My Profession:
Completely
Somewhat
Not at All
10. The Information will Change Practice:
A Great Deal
Moderate Amount
Not at All
10. Gained Knowledge from Presentation:
A Great Deal
Moderate Amount
Not at All
10. State one change in your practice:
*
10. Overall Rating of this Activity:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
_____________________________________________________________
BREAKOUT SESSION C: 10:30 - 11:30 am
11. The Leapfrog Group – Informing Decisions and Making Care Safe - Missy Danforth
11. Learning Objectives: A) Describe Leapfrog’s national ratings programs for hospitals. B) Identify which measures are included in each of Leapfrog’s programs. C) Describe how patients, purchasers, hospitals, and other can use the published ratings.
11. Did you Attend/View this Presentation?
Yes
No
11. Expertise of Presenter:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
11. Appropriateness of Teaching Strategies:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
11. The Presentation Objectives were Met:
Completely
Somewhat
Not at All
11. Quality of the Presentation Material:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
11. Presentation Rating and Relevance
11. Applicable to My Profession:
Completely
Somewhat
Not at All
11. The Information will Change Practice:
A Great Deal
Moderate Amount
Not at All
11. Gained Knowledge from Presentation:
A Great Deal
Moderate Amount
Not at All
11. State one change in your practice:
*
11. Overall Rating of this Activity:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
_____________________________________________________________
BREAKOUT SESSION C: 10:30 - 11:30 am
12. Transforming BC Health Care: The Power of the Patient Voices Network - Jami Brown, Huey Alley, Annmarie Elderkin
12. Learning Objectives: A) Describe at least three specific ways in which the Patient Voices Network (PVN) has connected patients, families, caregivers, and health care professionals to improve health care in British Columbia. B) Identify and explain at least two effective strategies and provide two examples of successful knowledge sharing and partnership-building between patients and health care teams, as demonstrated by the PVN, after the workshop. C) Discuss a personal action plan that includes at least three specific steps to apply PVN’s collaborative principles to improve health care decision-making and practice in their own communities.
12. Did you Attend/View this Presentation?
Yes
No
12. The Presentation Objectives were Met:
Completely
Somewhat
Not at All
12. Quality of the Presentation Material:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
12a. Jami Brown
12a. Expertise of Presenter:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
12a. Appropriateness of Teaching Strategies:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
12b. Hugh Alley
12b. Expertise of Presenter:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
12b. Appropriateness of Teaching Strategies:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
12c. Annmarie Elderkin
12c. Expertise of Presenter:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
12c. Appropriateness of Teaching Strategies:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
12. Presentation Rating and Relevance
12. Applicable to My Profession:
Completely
Somewhat
Not at All
12. The Information will Change Practice:
A Great Deal
Moderate Amount
Not at All
12. Gained Knowledge from Presentation:
A Great Deal
Moderate Amount
Not at All
12. State one change in your practice:
*
12. Overall Rating of this Activity:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
_____________________________________________________________
BREAKOUT SESSION C: 10:30 - 11:30 am
13. Patient decision aids to enhance shared decision making - Dan Matlock, MD, MPH; Dawn Stacey, RN, PhD, FRSC, FCAHS, FAAN, FCAN; Randall Moseley, MD
Learning Objectives: A) Explain the state of the science supporting patient decision aids. B) Identify challenges and facilitators for implementation of patient decision aids to enhance shared decision making. C) Describe applications in cancer screening and cardiac treatment decisions.
13. Did you Attend/View this Presentation?
Yes
No
13. The Presentation Objectives were Met:
Completely
Somewhat
Not at All
13. Quality of the Presentation Material:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
13a. Dan Matlock, MD, MPH
13a. Expertise of Presenter:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
13a. Appropriateness of Teaching Strategies:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
13b. Dawn Stacey, RN, PhD, FRSC, FCAHS, FAAN, FCAN
13b. Expertise of Presenter:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
13b. Appropriateness of Teaching Strategies:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
13c. Randall Moseley, MD
13c. Expertise of Presenter:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
13c. Appropriateness of Teaching Strategies:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
13. Presentation Rating and Relevance
13. Applicable to My Profession:
Completely
Somewhat
Not at All
13. The Information will Change Practice:
A Great Deal
Moderate Amount
Not at All
13. Gained Knowledge from Presentation:
A Great Deal
Moderate Amount
Not at All
13. State one change in your practice:
*
13. Overall Rating of this Activity:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
_______________________________________________________________
KEYNOTE 5: 11:45 am - 12:45 pm
14. “Strengthening our Resilience - Implementation of Safer Together: A National Action Plan to Advance Patient Safety.” - Leigh Simmons, MD
Learning Objectives: A) Identify clinical areas for shared decision making at your institution. B) Describe strategies for shared decision-making implementation. C) Discuss possible barriers to SDM implementation at your institution and formulate strategies to overcome these barriers.
14. Did you Attend/View this Presentation?
Yes
No
14. The Presentation Objectives were Met:
Completely
Somewhat
Not at All
14. Quality of the Presentation Material:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
14. Expertise of Presenter:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
14. Appropriateness of Teaching Strategies:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
14. Presentation Rating and Relevance
14. Applicable to My Profession:
Completely
Somewhat
Not at All
14. The Information will Change Practice:
A Great Deal
Moderate Amount
Not at All
14. Gained Knowledge from Presentation:
A Great Deal
Moderate Amount
Not at All
14. State one change in your practice:
*
14. Overall Rating of this Activity:
Excellent
Acceptable
Disappointing
Poor
Comments:
Submit
© 2024 Foundation for Health Care Quality |
Privacy Statement
|
Disclaimer